Skip to main content
the term "architecture" seems to be more common than topology in the context of neural networks, which can be used in different contexts to refer to different things, so we should prefer the term/tag "architecture" to avoid ambiguities. (comment edited Dec 13, 2021 at 14:35)
Source Link
nbro
  • 41.4k
  • 12
  • 114
  • 205

How can I automate the choice of the topologyarchitecture of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with a neural network that either I can't fit to already existing topologiesarchitectures (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I automate the choice of the topologyarchitecture/topology (that is, the number of layers, the type of activations, the type and direction of the connections, etc.) of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some topologiesarchitectures (or, at least, in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics, as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

How can I automate the choice of the topology of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with a neural network that either I can't fit to already existing topologies (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I automate the choice of the topology (that is, the number of layers, the type of activations, the type and direction of the connections, etc.) of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some topologies (or, at least in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

How can I automate the choice of the architecture of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with a neural network that either I can't fit to existing architectures (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I automate the choice of the architecture/topology (that is, the number of layers, the type of activations, the type and direction of the connections, etc.) of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some architectures (or, at least, in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics, as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

deleted 49 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
Source Link
nbro
  • 41.4k
  • 12
  • 114
  • 205

How can I planautomate the choice of the topology of a neural network for a given "random"an arbitrary problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with a neural network that either I can't fit to already existing topologies (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I deconstruct a problem to find a corresponding neural network topology? By this I don't mean onlyautomate the sizechoice of certain layersthe topology (that is, but the number of themlayers, the type of activation functionsactivations, the numbertype and the direction of the connections, and so onetc.) of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some topologies (or, at least in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

How can I plan the topology of a neural network for a given "random" problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with neural network that either I can't fit to already existing topologies (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I deconstruct a problem to find a corresponding neural network topology? By this I don't mean only the size of certain layers, but the number of them, the type of activation functions, the number and the direction of connections, and so on.

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some topologies (or, at least in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

How can I automate the choice of the topology of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

Assume that I want to solve an issue with a neural network that either I can't fit to already existing topologies (perceptron, Konohen, etc) or I'm simply not aware of the existence of those or I'm unable to understand their mechanics and I rely on my own instead.

How can I automate the choice of the topology (that is, the number of layers, the type of activations, the type and direction of the connections, etc.) of a neural network for an arbitrary problem?

I'm a beginner, yet I realized that in some topologies (or, at least in perceptrons) it is very hard if not impossible to understand the inner mechanics as the neurons of the hidden layers don't express any mathematically meaningful context.

Added key word that identifies the nature of the question.
Link
Douglas Daseeco
  • 7.5k
  • 1
  • 27
  • 63
Source Link
Loading