Skip to main content

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

For example Spatial Localization and Detection lectureLecture 8: Spatial Localization and Detection lecture shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

Table/Performance: Real-Time Detectors

Table/Performance: R-CNN, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

For example Spatial Localization and Detection lecture shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

Table/Performance: Real-Time Detectors

Table/Performance: R-CNN, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

For example Lecture 8: Spatial Localization and Detection lecture shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

Table/Performance: Real-Time Detectors

Table/Performance: R-CNN, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

Improving post formatting.
Source Link
kenorb
  • 10.5k
  • 4
  • 45
  • 95

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

For example http://cs231n.stanford.edu/slides/winter1516_lecture8.pdfSpatial Localization and Detection lecture shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

enter image description hereTable/Performance: Real-Time Detectors

enter image description hereTable/Performance: R-CNN, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

http://cs231n.stanford.edu/slides/winter1516_lecture8.pdf shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

enter image description here

enter image description here

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

For example Spatial Localization and Detection lecture shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

Table/Performance: Real-Time Detectors

Table/Performance: R-CNN, Fast R-CNN, Faster R-CNN

Source Link

We are getting there, with as usual some trade-off between quality and speed.

http://cs231n.stanford.edu/slides/winter1516_lecture8.pdf shows some benchmarks (mAP = Mean Average Precision, higher is better; FPS = frame per second):

enter image description here

enter image description here