1
$\begingroup$

I changed the scope of the question to eligibility with the rules. Can you help me find true / full / strong AI theories?

$\endgroup$

closed as off-topic by Oliver Mason, DuttaA, nbro, DukeZhou Sep 9 at 20:53

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "This question does not appear to be about artificial intelligence, within the scope defined in the help center." – DukeZhou
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • $\begingroup$ I am doing this right now, are you interested in helping with development or just curious as to if their are any in existence? $\endgroup$ – nickw Sep 9 at 15:52
  • $\begingroup$ I am interested in development. I tried to do something alone, but after one year of development, I didn't get good results $\endgroup$ – belbix Sep 9 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ I am also developing mine solo atm, if you dont mind me asking what was your approach? mine is p2p neuroevolution, neat/eshyperneat specifically (the strong or full part involves some cheeky nlp fitness functions and layer of course) $\endgroup$ – nickw Sep 9 at 16:02
  • $\begingroup$ I developed a model as close to reality as possible. Probably partially similar to Spiking_neural_network. The goal was to create an infinitely scalable neuron with decentralized nodes. $\endgroup$ – belbix Sep 9 at 16:27
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @nickw write me on 7453635*g_m_*ai-l.com $\endgroup$ – belbix Sep 9 at 18:09

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.