With over 100 papers published in the area of artificial intelligence, machine learning and their subfields every day (source), accounting for ~3% of all publications world wide per year (source) and dozens of annual conferences like NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, ACL, ... I wonder how you keep up with the current state of the art and latest developments? The field is progressing very fast, models that were considered SOTA not even a decade ago are now (almost) outdated (Attention Is All You Need). A lot of this progress is driven by big tech companies (source), e.g. 12% of all papers accepted at NeurIPS 2019 have at least one author from Google and DeepMind (source).

My strategy is to read blogs and articles to maintain a general overview and not to miss any important breakthroughs. To be up to date in subfields of my own interest, I read specific papers once in a while. What are your personal strategies? Continuous education is a big keyword here. It's not about understanding every detail and being able to reproduce results, but rather maintaining a bird's eye view, having an idea about the direction of research and knowing whats already possible.

To name a few of my preferred sources there are the research blogs of the big players: OpenAI, DeepMind, Google AI, FAIR. Further there are very good personal blogs with a more educational character, like the well known one of Christopher Olah, the recently started one of Yoshua Bengio and the one from Jay Alammar. Unfortunately finding personal blogs is hard, it often depends on luck and referrals, also the update frequency is generally lower since these people have (understandably) other important things to do in life as well.

Therefore I'm always looking for new sources, which I can bookmark and read later, if I like to avoid doing other stuff.

Can you name any other personal / corporate research blogs or news websites that publish latest advances in ML & AI?

  • $\begingroup$ It's an interesting subject, but any question here that asks "What are your favorite..." is going to be off-topic sadly. If there's any way you could edit the question to make it more objective and suitable for the site, that would be better. $\endgroup$ – Neil Slater Jul 21 at 10:53
  • $\begingroup$ I edited my question and hopefully removed some of it's former subjectivity. $\endgroup$ – Tinu Jul 21 at 11:42
  • $\begingroup$ Well it is less subjective, but still hard to fit in the format. I guess a community wiki answer might work, if there is interest to put together a list for an answer. $\endgroup$ – Neil Slater Jul 21 at 12:20
  • $\begingroup$ This seems to be a duplicate of ai.stackexchange.com/q/13418/2444. Can you confirm that? $\endgroup$ – nbro Jul 21 at 13:01
  • $\begingroup$ The content of the question is similar, but the answer focuses less on blogs and more on pages gathering the latest papers. $\endgroup$ – Tinu Jul 21 at 15:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.