For RNN's to work efficiently, we vectorize the operations, which results in an input matrix of shape
m is the number of examples, e.g. sentences, and
max_seq_len is the maximum length that a sentence can have. Some examples have smaller lengths than this
max_seq_len. A solution is to pad these sentences.
One method to pad the sentences is called "zero-padding". This means that each sequence is padded with zeros. For example, given a vocabulary where each word is related to some index number, we can represent a sentence with length 4,
I am very confused
[23, 455, 234, 90]
Padding it to achieve a
max_seq_len=7, we obtain a sentence represented by:
[23, 455, 234, 90, 0, 0, 0]
The index 0 is not part of the vocabulary.
Another method to pad is to add a padding character, e.g.
<<pad>>, in our sentence:
I am very confused <<pad>>> <<pad>> <<pad>>
to achieve the
max_seq_len=7. We also add
<<pad>> in our vocabulary. Let's say its index is 1000. Then the sentence is represented by
[23, 455, 234, 90, 1000, 1000, 1000]
I have seen both methods used, but why is one used over the other? Are there any advantages or disadvantages comparing zero-padding with character-padding?