This question is a follow-up of this post and based on this paper. In section 2.2, the authors write:

In the first level, the 3D FCN is trained on images of the lowest resolution in order to capture the largest amount of context, downsampled with a factor of $d s_{1}=2 S$ and optimized using the Dice loss $\mathcal{L}_{1} .$ This can be thought of as a form of deep supervision. In the next level, we use the predicted segmentation maps as a second input channel to the 3D FCN while learning from the images at a higher resolution, downsampled by a factor of $d s_{2}=d s_{1} / 2$, and optimized using Dice loss $\mathcal{L}_{2} .$

What does it mean by downsampling again by ds2? Shouldn't they upsample prediction by 2 or to the original size of a high-resolution patch?

We usually down-sample by an integer factor, right? Then why fraction $ds_1 / 2$?

In my understanding the framework is:

down-sample > train > prediction mask > up-sample > concatenate with high-res

Please explain with image size if possible.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.