# Why many deep learning research papers continue to be in arXiv?

There are plenty of research papers, especially in deep learning are present only in arXiv with large number of citations. I cannot find them in journals as peer-reviewed ones.

For example if I search for Conditional Generative Adversarial Nets then I can find only an arXiv pre-print and has been Cited by 5722

This is not the single paper and I personally found lot of papers in pre-print only with no journal/conference affiliation. Many research papers are at-least 3 years old.

Is it solely due to the will of authors or is there any other reason for this phenomenon of not getting published even though they are widely accepted especially in the domain of deep learning?

• I would imagine that the speed of development is faster than the publishing and review cycle of journals. And unless peer-reviewed publications are required for career progression, there is no point in going through the effort of preparing them. Much better to continue working and make new discoveries instead. If something is peer-reviewed, that doesn't necessarily mean it's higher quality, just that it is accepted by the establishment in your field. Aug 6 '21 at 7:54