# Q learning tic tac toe

I have a tic-tac-toe with a Q-learning algorithm, and the AI plays against the same algorithm (but they don't share the same Q matrix). But after 200,000 games, I still beat the AI very easily and it's rather dumb. My selection is made by epsilon greedy policy.

What could cause the AI not to learn?

[EDIT]
Here is how I do it (pseudo code):

for(int i = 0; i < 200000; ++i){
//Game is restarted here
ticTacToe.play();
}


And in my ticTacToe I have a simple loop :

while(!isFinished()){
swapPlaying(); //Change the players' turn
Position toPlay = playing.whereToMove();

applyPosition(toPlay);
playing.update(toPlay);
}

//Here I just update my players whether they won, draw or lost.


In my players, I select the move with epsilon-greedy implemented sa below :

Moves moves = getMoves(); // Return every move available
Qvalues qValues = getQValues(moves); // return only qvalues of interest
//also create the state and add it to the Q-matrix if not already in.

if(!optimal) {
updateEpsilon(); //I update epsilon with simple linear function epsilon = 1/k, with k being the number of games played.
double r = (double) rand() / RAND_MAX; // Random between 0 and 1
if(r < epsilon) { //Exploration
return randomMove(moves); // Selection of a random move among every move available.
}
else {
return moveWithMaxQValue(qValues);
}
} else { // If I'm not in the training part anymore
return moveWithMaxQValue(qValues);
}


And I update with the following :

double reward = getReward() // Return 1 if game won, -1 if game lost, 0 otherwise
double thisQ, maxQ, newQ;
Grid prevGrid = Grid(*grid); //I have a shared_ptr on the grid for simplicity
prevGrid.removeAt(position) // We remove the action executed before

string state = stateToString(prevGrid);
thisQ = qTable[state][action];
mawQ = maxQValues();

newQ = thisQ + alpha * (reward + gamma*maxQ - thisQ);
qTable[state][action] = newQ;


As mentioned above, both AI have the same algorithm, but they are two distinct instances so they don't have the same Q-matrix. I read somewhere on Stack Overflow that I should take in account the movement of the opposite player, but I update a state after player move and opponent move so I don't think it's necessary.

• are you sure of the implementation? tic tac toe has a very limited set of alternative scenarios and Q-learning can even "memorize" the best game policy after a few number of iterations – Alireza Apr 12 '17 at 18:37
• Well I'm not very sure, but when it plays against me, it learns how to avoid loosing against my strategy. But it still need a couple of training set against me to properly learn. I thought I could have a self-trained program with both AI having a Q-learning algorithm. I figured something was wrong in the training part rather than the implementation. Maybe I can train it against an algorithm with minimax ? – Irindul Apr 16 '17 at 15:07
• I guess minimax would not be a good opponent for your algorithm; while minimax always plays the best move, so your QL algorithm always lose. and you know, QL learns from losing and winning, not only losing. self trained QLs should work. Check your explore-exploit ratio. It should start from around 0.95 and decrease over time. – Alireza Apr 16 '17 at 20:07
• I actually have a fixed ratio, I will try to make it decrease over time. – Irindul Apr 18 '17 at 9:25
• I've checked, and after 200,000 games, the AI has visited only 3000 states approximately, this mean there is a problem in my implementation doesn't it ? – Irindul Apr 18 '17 at 14:11