2
$\begingroup$

I am working on the Facial Expression Recognition Task. One of the most challenging tasks that I faced was human error in labeling the datasets (ex: let's say FER2013).

Are there anyways to Handle incorrect labeling of datasets in the classification tasks? Will using clustering methods and treating it as an unsupervised Learning problem (just a thought not have a clear idea) solve this kind of issue? or are any other methods available without treating it as an unsupervised task?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

In general the only way to deal with this is by quantifying these labeling mistakes in the output of the model, since the model will learn for them. And in many cases these are not really mistakes, but they encode the ambiguity of the task, particularly in interpreting facial emotions.

For this you need to use a model that can estimate Aleatoric uncertainty (this is data uncertainty). For classification you can use the cross-entropy loss combined with the sampling softmax function, which replaces a standard Dense layer with one that computes a Gaussian distribution for the softmax logits (so it predicts mean logit and variance logits).

This method is described in the paper "What uncertainties do we need in bayesian deep learning for computer vision?" (link), where the authors can also disentangle aleatoric from epistemic uncertainty.

I have run experiments exactly on the facial emotion recognition task (using the FER+ dataset), which you can find in my paper "A Deeper Look into Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty Disentanglement" (link). In this paper I show multiple uncertainty quantification methods and their ability to produce disentangled probabilities. If you only need aleatoric uncertainty, then only the sampling softmax is needed.

I even have an implementation of this layer in my keras-uncertainty library.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Quantifying uncertainty is useful, but I am not sure how it directly answers the OP's question. Could you perhaps add a paragraph about how the OP can use the uncertainty measurement to cope with incorrect ground truths in the data set. $\endgroup$ Jun 26 at 20:30
  • $\begingroup$ @NeilSlater yes, just did $\endgroup$
    – Dr. Snoopy
    Jun 26 at 21:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you @Dr.Snoopy this helps me a lot $\endgroup$ Jun 27 at 14:23

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .