Artificial Intelligence Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people interested in conceptual questions about life and challenges in a world where "cognitive" functions can be mimicked in purely digital environment. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this community
The naïve Bayes' generative algorithm is often represented by the following formula:
$$\text{argmax}_{y} p(y|x) = \text{argmax}_y \frac{p(x|y)p(y)}{p(x)} \approx \text{argmax}_y p(x|y)p(y)$$
Why do we have $p(x)=1$ which allows the approximation $\text{argmax}_y \frac{p(x|y)p(y)}{p(x)} \approx \text{argmax}_y p(x|y)p(y)$?
The answer from @kiner_shah in the comments has solved it:
They have eliminated it because in comparing probability for best outcome, it would just introduce additional division and the divisor p(x) is same for all candidates. For example, if I tell you to compare the largest of the following numbers: 3/2, 5/2, 1/2, you will without thinking pick 5/2 since the divisors are same and 5 is greatest of all.
p(x)is same for all candidates. For example, if I tell you to compare the largest of the following numbers: 3/2, 5/2, 1/2, you will without thinking pick 5/2 since the divisors are same and 5 is greatest of all. $\endgroup$ – kiner_shah Dec 2 '17 at 16:37