4
$\begingroup$

It seems that older RNNs have a limitation for their use cases and have been outperformed by other recurrent architectures, such as the LSTM and GRU.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Older forms of RNN can be lossy. Newer Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) neural network long- and short-term memory.
As a result these newer RNNs have greater memory control, allowing previous values to persist or to be reset as necessary for many sequences of steps, avoiding "gradient decay" or eventual degradation of the values passed from step to step. LSTM and GRU networks make this memory control possible with memory blocks and structures called gates that pass or reset values as appropriate.
Read more

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

LSTMs or GRUs are computationally more effective than the standard RNNs because they explicitly attempt to address the vanishing and exploding gradient problems, which are numerical problems related to the vanishing or explosion of the values of the gradient vector (the vector that contains the partial derivatives of the loss function with respect to the parameters of the model) that arise when training recurrent neural networks with gradient descent and back-propagation through time.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.