Timeline for While we split data in training and test data, why we have two pairs of each?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 9:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Feb 7, 2020 at 13:59 | comment | added | s_bh | As far as I know, I have never come across a scenario where such a split has been used. I clarified his doubt by answering the general approach to splitting a dataset (without explicitly hinting at the fact that he might have a misconception). If you are aware of a case where such a splitting condition is used, you are free to elucidate on it. | |
| Feb 7, 2020 at 13:38 | comment | added | nbro | You're not answering the question "While we split data in training and test data, why we have to pairs of each?" or addressing the confusion completely. The OP thinks that both the training and test datasets are again divided into two chunks. | |
| Feb 7, 2020 at 12:36 | history | edited | s_bh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 15 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2020 at 12:29 | history | edited | s_bh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2020 at 12:12 | history | edited | s_bh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 30 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2020 at 12:02 | history | answered | s_bh | CC BY-SA 4.0 |