Timeline for Is anybody still researching GOFAI?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2016 at 15:03 | comment | added | NietzscheanAI | Yup, it's a matter of opinion. | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 15:02 | comment | added | mindcrime♦ | I mean, yeah, you can argue either side of that, but for the purpose of this discussion, I think it's fair to lump their stuff in with GOFAI. It's not like there's a really strict definition of what GOFAI means anyway. :-) | |
| Sep 9, 2016 at 6:18 | comment | added | NietzscheanAI | I don't think the work at Hofstadter's group really classifies as GOFAI. Even 30 years ago (when CopyCat was at the height of development) the work there was a novel hybrid of symbolic and subsymbolic approaches. But yes, the work there now is certainly distinct from the vogue for statistical ML. | |
| Sep 8, 2016 at 23:35 | history | answered | mindcrime♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |