Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 19, 2021 at 13:42 vote accept Asher
Jan 20, 2021 at 17:05 history edited nbro CC BY-SA 4.0
deleted 62 characters in body; edited tags
Jul 2, 2020 at 18:03 history bumped CommunityBot This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
Jun 2, 2020 at 17:26 history edited Asher CC BY-SA 4.0
the another -> another
S Jun 1, 2020 at 12:22 history suggested Pluviophile CC BY-SA 4.0
fixed grammar
May 30, 2020 at 9:40 review Suggested edits
S Jun 1, 2020 at 12:22
May 26, 2020 at 13:29 history edited Asher CC BY-SA 4.0
clearer notation
May 26, 2020 at 11:37 answer added Asher timeline score: 3
May 25, 2020 at 23:25 history edited nbro CC BY-SA 4.0
edited tags; edited title
May 25, 2020 at 15:44 comment added David If so then you would be able to get $\mathbb{E}[R_t | S_{t-1} = s, A_{t-1} = a] = \sum_{s'} \mathbb{E}[R_t | S_{t-1} = s, A_{t-1} = a, S_t = s'] \mathbb{P}(S_t = s' | s, a) = r(s,a)$
May 25, 2020 at 15:36 comment added David $r(s,a,s') = \mathbb{E}[R_t | S_{t-1} = s, A_{t-1} = a, S_t = s']$?
May 25, 2020 at 15:24 comment added Asher I understand, but I think I didn't imply that...? In fact I'm kinda saying that you could get away by marginalizing s,a in the r(s,a,s') function (if you can say marginalize in this context, since r(s,a,s') is not a probability distribution).
May 25, 2020 at 15:09 comment added David sorry, my bad for not noticing the link. Note that if you have a joint distribution of $(X,Y)$ you can't find $\mathbb{E}[Y]$ by simply summing over $y$ and using the joint pmf - you would first need to marginalise the joint pmf to get the single pmf of $Y$, so your expectation doesn't work out.
May 25, 2020 at 14:58 comment added Asher I actually had that thread linked in my question, but: 1) I'm not claiming that the different reward functions can be made equivalent, but that the optimal policy to the overall MDP can; 2) In their solutions book, Norvig and Russell describe a transformation based on extending the state space with pre and post states, and a few more changes to the discount factor and the transitions to account for these additional states; 3) I wanted to know if taking the expectation over s' can do the trick too, at least for the R(s,a,s') to the R(s,a) case.
May 25, 2020 at 13:18 comment added David You might want to see this How are the reward functions $R(s)$, $R(s, a)$ and $R(s, a, s')$ equivalent? answer.
May 25, 2020 at 11:22 review First posts
May 26, 2020 at 0:36
May 25, 2020 at 11:19 history asked Asher CC BY-SA 4.0