Timeline for Should intelligent AI be granted the same rights as humans?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2016 at 13:21 | history | edited | satibel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added a few thoughts to try to stick a bit more to the question.
|
| Dec 18, 2016 at 20:20 | comment | added | Ben N | I understand your concerns. Please note that the question is attempting to reconcile two other philosophies on AI, so an answer to it should take both of those into account to produce its own judgment. Could you please edit your answer to include such a formulation? | |
| Dec 12, 2016 at 8:05 | comment | added | satibel | depends on how cloning is made, if it's an exact copy of you, there should be a period in which the copy should not be able to vote (say 5-10 years or so) Something might be also doable for AI copies. as an AI's memory would probably be stored somewhere, it would probably be clonable. | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 15:27 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Dec 9, 2016 at 17:10 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2016 at 15:10 | comment | added | GJZ | And secondly your opinion would be highly contentious if applied to cloning - does a clone of a human not deserve the right to vote? | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 15:09 | comment | added | GJZ | The AI does not necessarily have the ability to replicate itself | |
| Dec 9, 2016 at 13:39 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 9, 2016 at 15:20 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2016 at 13:36 | history | answered | satibel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |