Timeline for Can we combine Alpha-zero with GTP-4 to create a general AI?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 16, 2022 at 8:53 | comment | added | Neil Slater | You can try to extend the model to add meaning, in a similar way that AlphaZero's NN is extended to understand taking turns and the rules of chess (i.e. with additional models). By modelling a conversation with GPT-3, you would already be providing something (although a very fixed taking-turns conversation model, it is something). Same if you tried to guide to positive sentiment. What I am saying is that is nowhere near enough to claim to have an AGI. | |
| Jul 16, 2022 at 8:49 | comment | added | Neil Slater | AlphaZero, when trained, does have a model of how to play chess, using the same meanings as I am using. Although it's model of how time/turns work, and the rules of the game are hard-coded, not learned. The difference I am trying to express is that a system like GPT has a model of how words work, but the interpretation of what those words mean and how they are being used is all external to it. It is a sophisticated symbol prediction machine that only has references to the symbols and how they combine in its model. | |
| Jul 16, 2022 at 0:30 | comment | added | zooby | True, but then we might say Alpha Zero has no model of how to play chess and yet it can play chess! | |
| Jul 15, 2022 at 18:54 | comment | added | Neil Slater | @zooby That might work to aid the search for responses that try to guide the conversation as opposed to simply fit it, although I'd hestitate to call the resulting system an AGI by any measure (it still has no internal model of what it is doing or why), it might make for an interesting chatbot design. | |
| Jul 15, 2022 at 17:14 | comment | added | zooby | Well there are many "sentiment" analysis AI's, so the "goal" of such an AI might be to elicit good "happy, engaged and non-angry" replies from the human. As such the primary focus of such an AI would be to make a human laugh or be happy and not bored. A human might become angry and bored if the AI started talking gibberish for example or get the human's name wrong. You are right that a main thing it lacks is the ability to see a human's face and judge it's emotional response. But then again, humans can communicate through text too. | |
| Jul 14, 2022 at 7:41 | history | answered | Neil Slater | CC BY-SA 4.0 |