Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with multi-armed-bandits
Search options questions only
not deleted
user 2254
For questions related to the multi-armed bandit (MAB) problem, in which a fixed limited set of resources must be allocated between competing (alternative) choices in a way that maximizes their expected gain, when each choice's properties are only partially known at the time of allocation.
1
vote
0
answers
120
views
Is there a paper/article on contextual $\epsilon$-greedy algorithm?
I am reading the paper A Contextual-Bandit Approach to Personalized News Article Recommendation, where it refers to $\epsilon$-greedy (disjoint) algorithm. I suspect, that it is just a version of a K- …
- 243
2
votes
1
answer
676
views
Difference in UCB performance when scaling the rewards
I notice the following behavior when running experiments with $\epsilon$-greedy and UCB1. If the reward is kept binary (0 or 1) both algorithm's performances are on par with each other. However, if I …
- 243