Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with alphago-zero
Search options not deleted
user 40603
For questions related to AlphaGo Zero, which is a version of DeepMind's Go software, AlphaGo, that does not use data from human games and it is stronger than AlphaGo. There is a generalized version of AlphaGo Zero called AlphaZero, which beat the 3-day version of AlphaGo Zero by winning 60 games to 40. AlphaGo Zero was introduced in the paper "Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge" (2017) by David Silver et al.
1
vote
2
answers
609
views
In Alpha(Go)Zero, why is the policy extracted from MCTS better than the network one?
I've read through the Alpha(Go)Zero paper and there is only one thing I don't understand.
The paper on page 1 states:
The MCTS search outputs probabilities π of playing each move. These search probab …
- 43