Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with neuroevolution
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 51956
For questions related to neuroevolution (or neuro-evolution) techniques, such as NEAT, that are used to evolve (or train) artificial neural networks (that is, they are used evolve their parameters or topology), inspired by the natural evolution. A neuroevolution algorithm is thus an evolutionary algorithm where the genomes (individuals or chromosomes) are artificial neural networks.
2
votes
Order of operations on sparse recurrent network alters the output. How to deal with it?
I believe NEAT just loops through the nodes in the order they appear in a list.
Looking at the source (.cpp) and removing time features it looks like this in JS:
do{
// For each node, compute the …
- 21