0
$\begingroup$

Someone has already asked a question about this. But I implemented the suggestion made in the comments without success. So I was wondering if anybody had a better idea. I changed the mutation power for the bias and the weights to 5. And the number of genomes roughly doubles after every generation. Consequently the genetic algorithm is taken ages. Is there any solution for this?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Can you please put your specific question in the title and explain in the body why your question is different from the one in the other post? Thanks. $\endgroup$
    – nbro
    Commented May 16, 2023 at 10:05
  • $\begingroup$ @nbro Actually my question is not so different. Should I delete my question? Also I have found an answer myself. Should I answer in the other post? $\endgroup$
    – eeqesri
    Commented May 17, 2023 at 8:30
  • $\begingroup$ If the answers to the other very similar question don't answer your question, then you can keep it, I'd say. $\endgroup$
    – nbro
    Commented May 17, 2023 at 11:49

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
0
$\begingroup$

One can overcome the problem of exploding population by increasing the compatibility threshold. This way one need not compromise the mutation rate.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .