Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with philosophy-of-math
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 16363
Use for question related to formal logic, naive and axiomatic set theory, infinitary math, etc.
1
vote
Do we need as much information to know if we can can answer a question as we need to actuall...
No in general.
Example: What values can x assume?
1. a * x^2 + b * x + c = 0, a,b,c are integer numbers.
2. a = 44^2 + 347829 ^ 21
3. b = 39289238
4. c = 999!
To know if you can answer this question …
- 1,219