1
$\begingroup$

I am using feedforward neural network for regression and what I get as a result of prediction is a constant value visible on the graph below: enter image description here

Data I use are typical standardised tabular numbers. The architecture is as follows:

model.add(Dropout(0.2))
model.add(Dense(units=512, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Dense(units=256, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dropout(0.3))
model.add(Dense(units=128, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(units=128, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(units=1))

adam = optimizers.Adam(lr=0.1)

model.compile(loss='mean_squared_error', optimizer=adam)

reduce_lr = ReduceLROnPlateau(
    monitor='val_loss',
    factor=0.9,
    patience=10,
    min_lr=0.0001,
    verbose=1)

tensorboard = TensorBoard(log_dir="logs\{}".format(NAME))

history = model.fit(
    x_train,
    y_train,
    epochs=500,
    verbose=10,
    batch_size=128,
    callbacks=[reduce_lr, tensorboard],
    validation_split=0.1)

It seems to me that all weights are zeroed and only constant bias is present here, since for different data samples from a test set I get the same value, but I am not sure.

I understand that the algorithm has found smallest MSE for such a constant value, but is there a way of avoiding such situation, since straight line is not really good solution for my project?

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Have you tried experimenting with a lower learning rate as a starting point? You're starting with 0.1 which is quite high for most of the cases, and only reduce by 0.9 which is not much. $\endgroup$
    – razvanc92
    Commented Aug 27, 2019 at 7:31
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ I have now and it worked out! Lowering initial learning rate to 0.005 eliminated straight line as an output. You can post it as an answer :) Thanks! $\endgroup$
    – GKozinski
    Commented Aug 27, 2019 at 8:18
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ and if you have some idea why this happens so, with greater learning rate, please do share as well. $\endgroup$
    – GKozinski
    Commented Aug 27, 2019 at 8:26

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

You should try experimenting with a lower learning rate as a starting point. You're starting with 0.1 which is quite high for most of the cases, and only reduce by 0.9 which is not much.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .